I’m officially admitting it…I’m becoming infatuated with a story (this story is now more than 1-2 years old now) that at first I dismissed it as nothing more than a series of really good fakes concocted to get somebody a lot of attention. Yes, there have been one or two fakes of this “Drone” story. If WordPress will allow me, I’ll post two pics of the drone that had garnered the most attention. If, and only if these are truly alien drones or perhaps interdimensional type drones, what are their true purposes here? Are we as a species being observed and scrutinized to see if we are worthy of direct contact? Or maybe are these drones studying us or the environment simply because that whoever is on the observing end are preparing for invasion, or just perhaps integration into our society?
More pictures and or information of these drones can be found at:
As always, study the claims and use good old fashioned detective work…study, observe, gain facts etc., and draw your own conclusions. Here’s the highlights of this fascinating story below…
June 29, 2007 Montgomery, Alabama – This week on Tuesday, June 26th, the mystery of the dragonfly-shaped aerial drones took another turn with the release of an alleged secret report containing photographs of alleged extraterrestrial technologies, entitled “Commercial Applications Research for Extraterrestrial Technology (CARET), the Q4-86 Research Report”, dated December 1986, Palo Alto, California, by the Palo Alto CARET Laboratory, also known as PACL (pronounced ‘packel’). The CARET Laboratory’s research goal is stated as, achieving a greater understanding of extraterrestrial technology within the context of commercial applications and civilian use.
The “Drone” objects:
The document states that the CARET Q4-86 research focused on four key subjects, all of which were based on artifacts of extraterrestrial origin obtained from crash site recovery operations conducted during the last two decades within the continental United States, between 1966 and 1986.
The four subjects are listed as:
- 1. Personal antigravity generator (so-named for its small, portable size);2. Three-dimensional image recorder/projector
3. A complex system of symbols and geometric constructs capable of both defining the functionality of certain artifacts as well as manipulating their behavior, crudely analogous to a computer programming language, but without the need for a compilation or interpretation phase.
4. is BLACKED OUT entirely. In a separate follow-up email, the document’s leaker – who calls himself by the alias Isaac – explained that the blacked out sections had been done by CARET in Palo Alto, and not by him.
The photographs show what are described as extraterrestrial instruments used for antigravity and for 3-dimensional image recording and projecting. The sizes of the photographed instruments are only inches long, according to Isaac and the document. But the instruments contain a symbol language that resembles what has been photographed in May 2007 underneath the “tails” of the estimated 25-foot-long dragonfly drones by Chad in the Bakersfield, California, region and by Rajman in Capitola, California. Odd Aerial “Drones”? Over Lake Tahoe over Central California
Those symbols have been studied intensely and led to the discovery of possible links between the ³dragonfly drone² tail symbols and NASA¹s Clementine I lunar photography and mapping mission in 1994. Writing In Chad “Drone” Image – A Link to NASA Clementine 1 Moon Mission?
In addition to the symbol language, the CARET document on Page 56, has a photograph of rings that closely match the structure of the rings in the larger scale dragonfly-drones, estimated to be about 25-feet-long.
Isaac¹s email and documents imply that this particular extraterrestrial technology was part of an American government effort to back-engineer, through civilian scientists, and apply commercially at the CARET Laboratory in Palo Alto. That E. T. technology allegedly can control gravity and project 3-dimensional images that apparently would look real to us humans, but are something akin to what we know as holographic images. The document also implies that the projected image technology can record.